« Previous
Next »
Blood Reviews
Volume 23, Issue 1
, Pages 11-23
, January 2009
Recent developments in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma
References
- . Incidence of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Sweden, Denmark, and Finland from 1960 through 2003: an epidemic that was. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1295–1300
- . Incidence of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease in Sardinia, Italy: 1974–1993. Haematologica. 2001;86:58–63
- Rising incidence of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Spain: analysis of period of diagnosis and cohort effects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7:621–625
- Changing trends in the incidence of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Europe. Ann Oncol. 1997;8(Suppl. 2):49–54
- . Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:581–592
- . Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:481–488
- . A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood. 1997;89:3909–3918
- . Different age limits for elderly patients with indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and the role of relative survival with increasing age. Cancer. 2000;89:2667–2676
- Hydroxyldaunomycin (Adriamycin) combination chemotherapy in malignant lymphoma. Cancer. 1976;38:1484–1493
- Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. New Engl J Med. 1993;328:1002–1006
- A phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup 0067), the National High-priority Lymphoma Study. Ann Oncol. 1994;5(Suppl. 2):91–95
- . A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. New Engl J Med. 1993;329:987–994
- CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. New Engl J Med. 2002;346:235–242
- Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4117–4126
- Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3121–3127
- Introduction of combined CHOP plus rituximab therapy dramatically improved outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in British Columbia. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5027–5033
- CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:379–391
- Long-term results of the GELA study comparing R-CHOP and CHOP chemotherapy in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma show good survival in poor-risk patients. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18S):[Abstract 8009]
- . ESMO Minimum Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of newly diagnosed large cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(Suppl. 1):i58–i59
- Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH) aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B1 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood. 2004;104:626–633
- Practicability and acute haematological toxicity of 2- and 3-weekly CHOP and CHOEP chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results from the NHL-B trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL). Ann Oncol. 2003;14:881–893
- Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood. 2004;104:634–641
- Dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (Hi-CHOEP) is not superior to base-line CHOEP in young good-prognosis patients with aggressive lymphoma: results of a randomized DSHNHL trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18S):[Abstract 7513]
- Intensified 12-week CHOP (I-CHOP) plus G-CSF compared with standard 24-week CHOP (CHOP-21) for patients with intermediate-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 3 trial of the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON). Blood. 2007;109:2759–2766
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: the national comprehensive cancer network clinical practice guidelines in oncology, version 1.2007; March 2, 2007. <http://www.nccn.org> [accessed 14.05.07].
- Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60). Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:105–116
- Bi-weekly dosing preserves the efficacy of rituximab in elderly patients with poor-prognosis DLBCL: results from the RICOVER-60 trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study group (DSHNHL). J Clin Oncol. 2006;24;[Abstract 7536]
- Dose-dense rituximab in combination with biweekly CHOP-14 for elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL): results of a phase-I/II and pharmacokinetic study of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL). Blood. 2006;108:774a
- . Serum levels and pharmacokinetic of rituximab in bi-weekly R-CHOP in elderly patients with DLBCL treated in the RICOVER-60 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18S):[Abstract 7537]
- Phase III trial of 2-weekly CHOP with rituximab for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in elderly patients. Blood. 2006;108;[Abstract 210]
- Safety of prophylactic use of darbepoetin alfa in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with R-CHOP 14 or R-CHOP21: preliminary results of the LNH03-6B randomized GELA study. Blood. 2006;108;[Abstract 2436]
- UK Clinical Research Network. A phase III multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing rituximab with CHOP given every 14 days and rituximab with CHOP given every 21 days for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. UKCRN ID 1437.<http://pfsearch.ukcrn.org.uk/StudyDetail.aspx?TopicID=1&StudyID=1437> [accessed 18.06.07].
- Achievement of optimal average relative dose intensity and correlation with survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CHOP. Ann Hematol. 2008;87:277–283
- Doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in elderly patients: comparison of treatment outcomes between young and elderly patients and the significance of doxorubicin dosage. Cancer. 2003;98:2651–2656
- Prognostic significance of received relative dose intensity in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: application to LNH-87 protocol. Ann Oncol. 1993;4:651–656
- Survival of diffuse large cell lymphoma: a multivariate analysis including dose intensity variables. Cancer. 1990;66:1124–1129
- . Prognostic significance of actual dose intensity in diffuse large-cell lymphoma: results of a tree-structured survival analysis. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:963–977
- Febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients is associated with substantial resource use and healthcare costs in clinical practice in Spain. Blood. 2006;108;[Abstract 5512]
- Pettengell R, Schwenkglenks M, Leonard R et al. Neutropenia occurrence and predictors of reduced chemotherapy delivery: results from the INC-EU prospective observational European neutropenia study. Support Care Cancer 2008 [Epub ahead of print].
- EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphomas and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:2433–2453
- Pegfilgrastim to support CHOP-14 in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006;47:2344–2350
- Pegfilgrastim as hematopoietic support for dose-dense chemoimmunotherapy with R-CHOP-14 as first-line therapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:877–884
- Dose-dense R-CHOP-14 supported by pegfilgrastim in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase II study of feasibility and toxicity. Haematologica. 2006;91:496–502
- Moore TD, Patel T, Segal ML et al. A single pegfilgrastim dose per cycle supports dose-dense (q14d) CHOP-R in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In: Presented at the 2003 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, December 7, 2003, San Diego, CA [Poster 2365].
- 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3187–3205
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Myeloid growth factors: the national comprehensive cancer network clinical practice guidelines in oncology, version 1.2007; December 8, 2006. <http://www.nccn.org> [accessed 14.05.07.
- SEER cancer statistics review, 1973–1997. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2000;
- . Incidence and predictors of low chemotherapy dose-intensity in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a nationwide study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4302–4311
- The impact of age on delivered dose intensity and hospitalizations for febrile neutropenia in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma receiving initial CHOP chemotherapy: a risk factor analysis. Clin Lymphoma. 2001;2:47–56
- EORTC cancer in the elderly task force guidelines for the use of colony-stimulating factors in elderly patients with cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:2264–2272
- Patterns of growth factor usage and febrile neutropenia among older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: an intergroup experience (CALGB 9793, ECOG-SWOG 4494). Blood. 2004;104;[Abstract 3309]
- Population-based assessment of hospitalizations for neutropenia from chemotherapy in older adults with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (United States). Cancer Cause Contr. 2006;17:647–654
- Elderly cancer patients receiving chemotherapy benefit from first-cycle pegfilgrastim. Oncologist. 2007;12:1416–1424
- . Novel treatment strategies for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2006;7:733–748
- Multicenter phase II study of bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4867–4874
PII: S0268-960X(08)00050-7
doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2008.05.002
© 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Blood Reviews
Volume 23, Issue 1
, Pages 11-23
, January 2009
